Ranch flavored tuna vs Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Ranch flavored tuna
Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Ranch flavored tuna and Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Ranch flavored tuna is the more energy-dense option here, packing 49 more calories per 100g than Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Ranch flavored tuna contains significantly more sugar (1.43g) compared to the milder Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Ranch flavored tuna offers a protein boost with 24.29g per 100g, outperforming Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Ranch flavored tuna or Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets?
It depends on your goals. Ranch flavored tuna has 142.86 calories, while Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets has 94 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Ranch flavored tuna vegan?
No, Ranch flavored tuna is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Ranch flavored tuna and Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets?
There is a difference of 49 calories per 100g between the two products.
