Head-to-Head Analysis

Rand vs Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Rand

Rand

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces

Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
366.7 kcal
Energy
263 kcal
0g
Sugars
31.6g
0g
Fat
9.2g
13.3g
Protein
2.6g
0g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Rand and Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Rand is the more energy-dense option here, packing 104 more calories per 100g than Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Rand takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces contains 31.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Rand offers a protein boost with 13.333333333333g per 100g, outperforming Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Rand or Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces?

It depends on your goals. Rand has 366.66666666667 calories, while Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces has 263 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Rand vegan?

No, Rand is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Rand and Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces?

There is a difference of 104 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.