Head-to-Head Analysis

Raw Argentinian Red Shrimp vs Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Raw Argentinian Red Shrimp

Raw Argentinian Red Shrimp

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water

Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
53.6 kcal
Energy
102 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0.4g
Fat
0.8g
12.5g
Protein
21.9g
0.7g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Raw Argentinian Red Shrimp and Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Raw Argentinian Red Shrimp is the clear winner. With 48 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Raw Argentinian Red Shrimp or Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water?

It depends on your goals. Raw Argentinian Red Shrimp has 53.6 calories, while Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water has 102 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Raw Argentinian Red Shrimp vegan?

No, Raw Argentinian Red Shrimp is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Raw Argentinian Red Shrimp and Solid White Albacore Tuna in Water?

There is a difference of 48 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.