Head-to-Head Analysis

Raw Brazilian Nuts vs Black pitted large california ripe olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Raw Brazilian Nuts

Raw Brazilian Nuts

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Black pitted large california ripe olives

Black pitted large california ripe olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
705 kcal
Energy
100 kcal
3.5g
Sugars
0g
70.5g
Fat
10g
14.1g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Raw Brazilian Nuts and Black pitted large california ripe olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Raw Brazilian Nuts is the more energy-dense option here, packing 605 more calories per 100g than Black pitted large california ripe olives. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Raw Brazilian Nuts contains significantly more sugar (3.53g) compared to the milder Black pitted large california ripe olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Black pitted large california ripe olives is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Raw Brazilian Nuts offers a protein boost with 14.1g per 100g, outperforming Black pitted large california ripe olives in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Raw Brazilian Nuts or Black pitted large california ripe olives?

It depends on your goals. Raw Brazilian Nuts has 705 calories, while Black pitted large california ripe olives has 100 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Raw Brazilian Nuts vegan?

No, Raw Brazilian Nuts is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Raw Brazilian Nuts and Black pitted large california ripe olives?

There is a difference of 605 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.