Head-to-Head Analysis

Raw Cashew, Walnut & Macadamia vs Soft Black Licorice Twists

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Raw Cashew, Walnut & Macadamia

Raw Cashew, Walnut & Macadamia

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Soft Black Licorice Twists

Soft Black Licorice Twists

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
643 kcal
Energy
333 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
40g
60.7g
Fat
0g
14.3g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Raw Cashew, Walnut & Macadamia and Soft Black Licorice Twists side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Raw Cashew, Walnut & Macadamia is the more energy-dense option here, packing 310 more calories per 100g than Soft Black Licorice Twists. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Raw Cashew, Walnut & Macadamia takes the lead with only 3.57g of sugar per 100g, whereas Soft Black Licorice Twists contains 40g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Raw Cashew, Walnut & Macadamia offers a protein boost with 14.3g per 100g, outperforming Soft Black Licorice Twists in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Raw Cashew, Walnut & Macadamia or Soft Black Licorice Twists?

It depends on your goals. Raw Cashew, Walnut & Macadamia has 643 calories, while Soft Black Licorice Twists has 333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Raw Cashew, Walnut & Macadamia vegan?

No, Raw Cashew, Walnut & Macadamia is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Raw Cashew, Walnut & Macadamia and Soft Black Licorice Twists?

There is a difference of 310 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.