Head-to-Head Analysis

Raw Cashews Snack Pack Plain vs Flipz Milk Chocolate Covered Pretzels

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Raw Cashews Snack Pack Plain

Raw Cashews Snack Pack Plain

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Flipz Milk Chocolate Covered Pretzels

Flipz Milk Chocolate Covered Pretzels

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
552.9 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
6g
Sugars
39.3g
44g
Fat
17.9g
18.3g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Raw Cashews Snack Pack Plain and Flipz Milk Chocolate Covered Pretzels side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Raw Cashews Snack Pack Plain is the more energy-dense option here, packing 89 more calories per 100g than Flipz Milk Chocolate Covered Pretzels. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Raw Cashews Snack Pack Plain takes the lead with only 6g of sugar per 100g, whereas Flipz Milk Chocolate Covered Pretzels contains 39.29g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Raw Cashews Snack Pack Plain offers a protein boost with 18.3333333333333g per 100g, outperforming Flipz Milk Chocolate Covered Pretzels in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Raw Cashews Snack Pack Plain or Flipz Milk Chocolate Covered Pretzels?

It depends on your goals. Raw Cashews Snack Pack Plain has 552.9 calories, while Flipz Milk Chocolate Covered Pretzels has 464 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Raw Cashews Snack Pack Plain vegan?

No, Raw Cashews Snack Pack Plain is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Raw Cashews Snack Pack Plain and Flipz Milk Chocolate Covered Pretzels?

There is a difference of 89 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.