Head-to-Head Analysis

Ready-To-Eat Meal Japanese Curry Noodles vs Chicken breast in water with rib meat

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Ready-To-Eat Meal Japanese Curry Noodles

Ready-To-Eat Meal Japanese Curry Noodles

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chicken breast in water with rib meat

Chicken breast in water with rib meat

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
42.9 kcal
Energy
83.3 kcal
5.7g
Sugars
0g
0.7g
Fat
1.8g
0.7g
Protein
15.5g
0.6g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ready-To-Eat Meal Japanese Curry Noodles and Chicken breast in water with rib meat side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Ready-To-Eat Meal Japanese Curry Noodles is the clear winner. With 40 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Ready-To-Eat Meal Japanese Curry Noodles contains significantly more sugar (5.71g) compared to the milder Chicken breast in water with rib meat (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chicken breast in water with rib meat is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ready-To-Eat Meal Japanese Curry Noodles or Chicken breast in water with rib meat?

It depends on your goals. Ready-To-Eat Meal Japanese Curry Noodles has 42.9 calories, while Chicken breast in water with rib meat has 83.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ready-To-Eat Meal Japanese Curry Noodles vegan?

No, Ready-To-Eat Meal Japanese Curry Noodles is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ready-To-Eat Meal Japanese Curry Noodles and Chicken breast in water with rib meat?

There is a difference of 40 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.