Head-to-Head Analysis

Red, White, & Blue Sorbet vs Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Red, White, & Blue Sorbet

Red, White, & Blue Sorbet

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium

Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
118.6 kcal
Energy
300 kcal
22.9g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
30g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Red, White, & Blue Sorbet and Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Red, White, & Blue Sorbet is the clear winner. With 181 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Red, White, & Blue Sorbet contains significantly more sugar (22.881355932203g) compared to the milder Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Red, White, & Blue Sorbet or Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium?

It depends on your goals. Red, White, & Blue Sorbet has 118.64406779661 calories, while Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium has 300 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Red, White, & Blue Sorbet vegan?

No, Red, White, & Blue Sorbet is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Red, White, & Blue Sorbet and Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium?

There is a difference of 181 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.