Head-to-Head Analysis

Reduced Fat vs Whole almonds

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Reduced Fat

Reduced Fat

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Whole almonds

Whole almonds

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
393 kcal
Energy
571.4 kcal
0g
Sugars
3.6g
8.9g
Fat
50g
10.7g
Protein
21.4g
1.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Reduced Fat and Whole almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Reduced Fat is the clear winner. With 178 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Reduced Fat takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Whole almonds contains 3.5714g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Reduced Fat or Whole almonds?

Reduced Fat appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Reduced Fat vegan?

No, Reduced Fat is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Reduced Fat and Whole almonds?

There is a difference of 178 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.