Reduced Fat Chocolate Milk vs Ruby Red Tangerine
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Reduced Fat Chocolate Milk
Ruby Red Tangerine
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Reduced Fat Chocolate Milk and Ruby Red Tangerine side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Reduced Fat Chocolate Milk is the more energy-dense option here, packing 72 more calories per 100g than Ruby Red Tangerine. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Reduced Fat Chocolate Milk contains significantly more sugar (5.93g) compared to the milder Ruby Red Tangerine (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Ruby Red Tangerine is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Reduced Fat Chocolate Milk offers a protein boost with 5.93g per 100g, outperforming Ruby Red Tangerine in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Reduced Fat Chocolate Milk or Ruby Red Tangerine?
It depends on your goals. Reduced Fat Chocolate Milk has 72 calories, while Ruby Red Tangerine has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Reduced Fat Chocolate Milk vegan?
No, Reduced Fat Chocolate Milk is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Reduced Fat Chocolate Milk and Ruby Red Tangerine?
There is a difference of 72 calories per 100g between the two products.
