Head-to-Head Analysis

Reduced Fat Coconut Milk vs Classic Bun Length Franks

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Reduced Fat Coconut Milk

Reduced Fat Coconut Milk

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Classic Bun Length Franks

Classic Bun Length Franks

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
119 kcal
Energy
232 kcal
1.7g
Sugars
5.4g
10.2g
Fat
17.9g
1.7g
Protein
8.9g
0.1g
Salt
2.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Reduced Fat Coconut Milk and Classic Bun Length Franks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Reduced Fat Coconut Milk is the clear winner. With 113 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Reduced Fat Coconut Milk takes the lead with only 1.69g of sugar per 100g, whereas Classic Bun Length Franks contains 5.36g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Reduced Fat Coconut Milk or Classic Bun Length Franks?

Reduced Fat Coconut Milk appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Reduced Fat Coconut Milk vegan?

No, Reduced Fat Coconut Milk is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Reduced Fat Coconut Milk and Classic Bun Length Franks?

There is a difference of 113 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.