Head-to-Head Analysis

Reduced Fat Milk vs Amul Pasteurized Butter

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Reduced Fat Milk

Reduced Fat Milk

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Amul Pasteurized Butter

Amul Pasteurized Butter

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
50 kcal
Energy
714.3 kcal
4.6g
Sugars
0g
2.1g
Fat
78.6g
3.3g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Reduced Fat Milk and Amul Pasteurized Butter side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Reduced Fat Milk is the clear winner. With 664 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Reduced Fat Milk contains significantly more sugar (4.58g) compared to the milder Amul Pasteurized Butter (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Amul Pasteurized Butter is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Reduced Fat Milk offers a protein boost with 3.33g per 100g, outperforming Amul Pasteurized Butter in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Reduced Fat Milk or Amul Pasteurized Butter?

It depends on your goals. Reduced Fat Milk has 50 calories, while Amul Pasteurized Butter has 714.28571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Reduced Fat Milk vegan?

No, Reduced Fat Milk is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Reduced Fat Milk and Amul Pasteurized Butter?

There is a difference of 664 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.