Reduced fat milk vs Original String
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Reduced fat milk
Original String
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Reduced fat milk and Original String side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Reduced fat milk is the clear winner. With 228 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Reduced fat milk contains significantly more sugar (5.83g) compared to the milder Original String (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original String is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Reduced fat milk or Original String?
It depends on your goals. Reduced fat milk has 58 calories, while Original String has 285.71 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Reduced fat milk vegan?
No, Reduced fat milk is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Reduced fat milk and Original String?
There is a difference of 228 calories per 100g between the two products.
