Reduced fat milk vs Roll Butter
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Reduced fat milk
Roll Butter
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Reduced fat milk and Roll Butter side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Reduced fat milk is the clear winner. With 655 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Reduced fat milk contains significantly more sugar (5.65g) compared to the milder Roll Butter (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Roll Butter is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Reduced fat milk offers a protein boost with 4.24g per 100g, outperforming Roll Butter in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Reduced fat milk or Roll Butter?
It depends on your goals. Reduced fat milk has 59.3 calories, while Roll Butter has 714 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Reduced fat milk vegan?
No, Reduced fat milk is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Reduced fat milk and Roll Butter?
There is a difference of 655 calories per 100g between the two products.
