Head-to-Head Analysis

Reduced Fat Milk vs Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Reduced Fat Milk

Reduced Fat Milk

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk

Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
58.3 kcal
Energy
120 kcal
5.8g
Sugars
6g
2.1g
Fat
4.5g
4.2g
Protein
13g
0.2g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Reduced Fat Milk and Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Reduced Fat Milk is the clear winner. With 62 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Reduced Fat Milk or Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk?

Reduced Fat Milk appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Reduced Fat Milk vegan?

No, Reduced Fat Milk is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Reduced Fat Milk and Reduced Fat Ultra-Filtered Milk?

There is a difference of 62 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.