Reduced fat milk vs Whole ultra-filtered milk
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Reduced fat milk
Whole ultra-filtered milk
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Reduced fat milk and Whole ultra-filtered milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Reduced fat milk is the clear winner. With 18 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Reduced fat milk contains significantly more sugar (5g) compared to the milder Whole ultra-filtered milk (2.5g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Whole ultra-filtered milk is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Reduced fat milk or Whole ultra-filtered milk?
It depends on your goals. Reduced fat milk has 44.6 calories, while Whole ultra-filtered milk has 62.5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Reduced fat milk vegan?
No, Reduced fat milk is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Reduced fat milk and Whole ultra-filtered milk?
There is a difference of 18 calories per 100g between the two products.
