reduced fat triscuit crackers vs Potato chips
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
reduced fat triscuit crackers
Potato chips
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing reduced fat triscuit crackers and Potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, reduced fat triscuit crackers is the clear winner. With 143 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, reduced fat triscuit crackers takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Potato chips contains 7.14g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? reduced fat triscuit crackers offers a protein boost with 10.7g per 100g, outperforming Potato chips in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: reduced fat triscuit crackers or Potato chips?
reduced fat triscuit crackers appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is reduced fat triscuit crackers vegan?
No, reduced fat triscuit crackers is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between reduced fat triscuit crackers and Potato chips?
There is a difference of 143 calories per 100g between the two products.
