Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk vs Vitamin D Whole Milk
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk
Vitamin D Whole Milk
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk and Vitamin D Whole Milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk is the clear winner. With 12 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk takes the lead with only 2.42g of sugar per 100g, whereas Vitamin D Whole Milk contains 5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk offers a protein boost with 5.56g per 100g, outperforming Vitamin D Whole Milk in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk or Vitamin D Whole Milk?
Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk vegan?
No, Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk and Vitamin D Whole Milk?
There is a difference of 12 calories per 100g between the two products.
