Head-to-Head Analysis

Reese’s brownie mix Imp vs Whole kosher dill cocktail pickles

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Reese’s brownie mix Imp

Reese’s brownie mix Imp

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Whole kosher dill cocktail pickles

Whole kosher dill cocktail pickles

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
433.3 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
56.7g
Sugars
0g
10g
Fat
0g
6.7g
Protein
0g
0.8g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Reese’s brownie mix Imp and Whole kosher dill cocktail pickles side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Reese’s brownie mix Imp is the more energy-dense option here, packing 433 more calories per 100g than Whole kosher dill cocktail pickles. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Reese’s brownie mix Imp contains significantly more sugar (56.67g) compared to the milder Whole kosher dill cocktail pickles (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Whole kosher dill cocktail pickles is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Reese’s brownie mix Imp offers a protein boost with 6.67g per 100g, outperforming Whole kosher dill cocktail pickles in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Reese’s brownie mix Imp or Whole kosher dill cocktail pickles?

It depends on your goals. Reese’s brownie mix Imp has 433.33 calories, while Whole kosher dill cocktail pickles has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Reese’s brownie mix Imp vegan?

No, Reese’s brownie mix Imp is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Reese’s brownie mix Imp and Whole kosher dill cocktail pickles?

There is a difference of 433 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.