Head-to-Head Analysis

Reese’s crunchy king size vs Dark chocolate mocha almond bar

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Reese’s crunchy king size

Reese’s crunchy king size

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Dark chocolate mocha almond bar

Dark chocolate mocha almond bar

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
567 kcal
Energy
425 kcal
30g
Sugars
12.5g
40g
Fat
37.5g
16.7g
Protein
12.5g
0.6g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Reese’s crunchy king size and Dark chocolate mocha almond bar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Reese’s crunchy king size is the more energy-dense option here, packing 142 more calories per 100g than Dark chocolate mocha almond bar. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Reese’s crunchy king size contains significantly more sugar (30g) compared to the milder Dark chocolate mocha almond bar (12.5g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Dark chocolate mocha almond bar is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Reese’s crunchy king size offers a protein boost with 16.666666666667g per 100g, outperforming Dark chocolate mocha almond bar in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Reese’s crunchy king size or Dark chocolate mocha almond bar?

It depends on your goals. Reese’s crunchy king size has 567 calories, while Dark chocolate mocha almond bar has 425 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Reese’s crunchy king size vegan?

No, Reese’s crunchy king size is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Reese’s crunchy king size and Dark chocolate mocha almond bar?

There is a difference of 142 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.