Reese’s White Trees vs Original Butterscotch
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Reese’s White Trees
Original Butterscotch
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Reese’s White Trees and Original Butterscotch side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Reese’s White Trees is the more energy-dense option here, packing 484 more calories per 100g than Original Butterscotch. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Reese’s White Trees contains significantly more sugar (44.1g) compared to the milder Original Butterscotch (11g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original Butterscotch is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Reese’s White Trees offers a protein boost with 11.8g per 100g, outperforming Original Butterscotch in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Reese’s White Trees or Original Butterscotch?
It depends on your goals. Reese’s White Trees has 529 calories, while Original Butterscotch has 45 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Reese’s White Trees vegan?
No, Reese’s White Trees is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Reese’s White Trees and Original Butterscotch?
There is a difference of 484 calories per 100g between the two products.
