Head-to-Head Analysis

Reeses Collisers Layered vs Ice breakers ice cubes wintergreen

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Reeses Collisers Layered

Reeses Collisers Layered

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Ice breakers ice cubes wintergreen

Ice breakers ice cubes wintergreen

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
181.8 kcal
Energy
217 kcal
18.2g
Sugars
0g
9.1g
Fat
0g
3g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Reeses Collisers Layered and Ice breakers ice cubes wintergreen side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Reeses Collisers Layered is the clear winner. With 35 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Reeses Collisers Layered contains significantly more sugar (18.181818181818g) compared to the milder Ice breakers ice cubes wintergreen (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Ice breakers ice cubes wintergreen is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Reeses Collisers Layered offers a protein boost with 3.030303030303g per 100g, outperforming Ice breakers ice cubes wintergreen in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Reeses Collisers Layered or Ice breakers ice cubes wintergreen?

It depends on your goals. Reeses Collisers Layered has 181.81818181818 calories, while Ice breakers ice cubes wintergreen has 217 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Reeses Collisers Layered vegan?

No, Reeses Collisers Layered is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Reeses Collisers Layered and Ice breakers ice cubes wintergreen?

There is a difference of 35 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.