Head-to-Head Analysis

Retro Cola vs Fruit by the Foot

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Retro Cola

Retro Cola

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Fruit by the Foot

Fruit by the Foot

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
381 kcal
0g
Sugars
47.6g
0g
Fat
4.8g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Retro Cola and Fruit by the Foot side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Retro Cola is the clear winner. With 381 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Retro Cola takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Fruit by the Foot contains 47.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Retro Cola or Fruit by the Foot?

Retro Cola appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Retro Cola vegan?

No, Retro Cola is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Retro Cola and Fruit by the Foot?

There is a difference of 381 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.