Head-to-Head Analysis

Rice And Veggie Crisps vs Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Rice And Veggie Crisps

Rice And Veggie Crisps

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips

Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
464 kcal
Energy
429 kcal
0g
Sugars
17.9g
17.9g
Fat
25g
10.7g
Protein
3.6g
1.3g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Rice And Veggie Crisps and Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Rice And Veggie Crisps is the more energy-dense option here, packing 35 more calories per 100g than Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Rice And Veggie Crisps takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips contains 17.9g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Rice And Veggie Crisps offers a protein boost with 10.7g per 100g, outperforming Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Rice And Veggie Crisps or Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips?

It depends on your goals. Rice And Veggie Crisps has 464 calories, while Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips has 429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Rice And Veggie Crisps vegan?

No, Rice And Veggie Crisps is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Rice And Veggie Crisps and Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips?

There is a difference of 35 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.