Head-to-Head Analysis

Rice Cakes with Milk Chocolate Flavour Coating vs Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Rice Cakes with Milk Chocolate Flavour Coating

Rice Cakes with Milk Chocolate Flavour Coating

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size

Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
457 kcal
Energy
438 kcal
0g
Sugars
39.6g
18g
Fat
12.5g
5.7g
Protein
4.2g
0g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Rice Cakes with Milk Chocolate Flavour Coating and Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Rice Cakes with Milk Chocolate Flavour Coating is the more energy-dense option here, packing 19 more calories per 100g than Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Rice Cakes with Milk Chocolate Flavour Coating takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size contains 39.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Rice Cakes with Milk Chocolate Flavour Coating or Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size?

It depends on your goals. Rice Cakes with Milk Chocolate Flavour Coating has 457 calories, while Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size has 438 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Rice Cakes with Milk Chocolate Flavour Coating vegan?

No, Rice Cakes with Milk Chocolate Flavour Coating is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Rice Cakes with Milk Chocolate Flavour Coating and Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size?

There is a difference of 19 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.