Head-to-Head Analysis

Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk vs Deluxe Mixed Nuts with Sea Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk

Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Deluxe Mixed Nuts with Sea Salt

Deluxe Mixed Nuts with Sea Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
465 kcal
Energy
643 kcal
39.5g
Sugars
7.1g
18.6g
Fat
53.6g
4.7g
Protein
17.9g
0.9g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk and Deluxe Mixed Nuts with Sea Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk is the clear winner. With 178 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk contains significantly more sugar (39.5g) compared to the milder Deluxe Mixed Nuts with Sea Salt (7.14g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Deluxe Mixed Nuts with Sea Salt is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk or Deluxe Mixed Nuts with Sea Salt?

It depends on your goals. Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk has 465 calories, while Deluxe Mixed Nuts with Sea Salt has 643 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk vegan?

No, Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Rice Krispies Treats Double Chocolatey Chunk and Deluxe Mixed Nuts with Sea Salt?

There is a difference of 178 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.