Rigatoni vs reduced fat triscuit crackers
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Rigatoni
reduced fat triscuit crackers
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Rigatoni and reduced fat triscuit crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Rigatoni is the clear winner. With 229 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Rigatoni contains significantly more sugar (2.18g) compared to the milder reduced fat triscuit crackers (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, reduced fat triscuit crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Rigatoni or reduced fat triscuit crackers?
It depends on your goals. Rigatoni has 164 calories, while reduced fat triscuit crackers has 393 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Rigatoni vegan?
No, Rigatoni is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Rigatoni and reduced fat triscuit crackers?
There is a difference of 229 calories per 100g between the two products.
