Head-to-Head Analysis

Ristretto Classico vs Muscat Gummy Candy

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Ristretto Classico

Ristretto Classico

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Muscat Gummy Candy

Muscat Gummy Candy

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
300 kcal
0g
Sugars
57g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ristretto Classico and Muscat Gummy Candy side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Ristretto Classico is the clear winner. With 300 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Ristretto Classico takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Muscat Gummy Candy contains 57g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ristretto Classico or Muscat Gummy Candy?

Ristretto Classico appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Ristretto Classico vegan?

No, Ristretto Classico is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ristretto Classico and Muscat Gummy Candy?

There is a difference of 300 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.