Head-to-Head Analysis

Ritz crackers vs Dubai Style Chocolate Strawberry Pistachio Truffle Bites

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Ritz crackers

Ritz crackers

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Dubai Style Chocolate Strawberry Pistachio Truffle Bites

Dubai Style Chocolate Strawberry Pistachio Truffle Bites

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
467 kcal
6.3g
Sugars
53.3g
28.1g
Fat
20g
6.3g
Protein
3.3g
2g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ritz crackers and Dubai Style Chocolate Strawberry Pistachio Truffle Bites side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Ritz crackers is the more energy-dense option here, packing 33 more calories per 100g than Dubai Style Chocolate Strawberry Pistachio Truffle Bites. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Ritz crackers takes the lead with only 6.25g of sugar per 100g, whereas Dubai Style Chocolate Strawberry Pistachio Truffle Bites contains 53.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Ritz crackers offers a protein boost with 6.25g per 100g, outperforming Dubai Style Chocolate Strawberry Pistachio Truffle Bites in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ritz crackers or Dubai Style Chocolate Strawberry Pistachio Truffle Bites?

It depends on your goals. Ritz crackers has 500 calories, while Dubai Style Chocolate Strawberry Pistachio Truffle Bites has 467 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ritz crackers vegan?

No, Ritz crackers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ritz crackers and Dubai Style Chocolate Strawberry Pistachio Truffle Bites?

There is a difference of 33 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.