Head-to-Head Analysis

Ritz Crackers Original vs The Original Organic Premium Roasted Seaweed Snack

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Ritz Crackers Original

Ritz Crackers Original

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of The Original Organic Premium Roasted Seaweed Snack

The Original Organic Premium Roasted Seaweed Snack

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
513 kcal
Energy
300 kcal
7.5g
Sugars
0g
27g
Fat
40g
6.5g
Protein
6g
1.1g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ritz Crackers Original and The Original Organic Premium Roasted Seaweed Snack side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Ritz Crackers Original is the more energy-dense option here, packing 213 more calories per 100g than The Original Organic Premium Roasted Seaweed Snack. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Ritz Crackers Original contains significantly more sugar (7.5g) compared to the milder The Original Organic Premium Roasted Seaweed Snack (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, The Original Organic Premium Roasted Seaweed Snack is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ritz Crackers Original or The Original Organic Premium Roasted Seaweed Snack?

It depends on your goals. Ritz Crackers Original has 513 calories, while The Original Organic Premium Roasted Seaweed Snack has 300 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ritz Crackers Original vegan?

No, Ritz Crackers Original is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ritz Crackers Original and The Original Organic Premium Roasted Seaweed Snack?

There is a difference of 213 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.