Head-to-Head Analysis

Ritz whole wheat vs Condeza cuban crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Ritz whole wheat

Ritz whole wheat

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Condeza cuban crackers

Condeza cuban crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
467 kcal
Energy
433.3 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
16.7g
Fat
13.3g
6.7g
Protein
13.3g
0g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ritz whole wheat and Condeza cuban crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Ritz whole wheat is the more energy-dense option here, packing 34 more calories per 100g than Condeza cuban crackers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ritz whole wheat or Condeza cuban crackers?

It depends on your goals. Ritz whole wheat has 467 calories, while Condeza cuban crackers has 433.33333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ritz whole wheat vegan?

No, Ritz whole wheat is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ritz whole wheat and Condeza cuban crackers?

There is a difference of 34 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.