Head-to-Head Analysis

Roast beef ultra-thin deli slices vs Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Roast beef ultra-thin deli slices

Roast beef ultra-thin deli slices

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo

Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
125 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
2.9g
6.3g
Fat
2.9g
19.6g
Protein
5.8g
1.5g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Roast beef ultra-thin deli slices and Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Roast beef ultra-thin deli slices is the more energy-dense option here, packing 18 more calories per 100g than Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Roast beef ultra-thin deli slices takes the lead with only 1.79g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo contains 2.92g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Roast beef ultra-thin deli slices offers a protein boost with 19.64g per 100g, outperforming Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Roast beef ultra-thin deli slices or Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo?

It depends on your goals. Roast beef ultra-thin deli slices has 143 calories, while Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo has 125 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Roast beef ultra-thin deli slices vegan?

No, Roast beef ultra-thin deli slices is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Roast beef ultra-thin deli slices and Chunky Chicken & Sausage Gumbo?

There is a difference of 18 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.