Head-to-Head Analysis

Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef vs Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef

Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties

Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
137 kcal
Energy
200 kcal
0g
Sugars
5g
4.1g
Fat
10g
23.6g
Protein
20g
0.2g
Salt
1.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef and Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef is the clear winner. With 63 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties contains 5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef offers a protein boost with 23.6g per 100g, outperforming Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef or Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties?

Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef vegan?

No, Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Roast British Peppered Topside of Beef and Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties?

There is a difference of 63 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.