Head-to-Head Analysis

Roasted Salted Macadamia Nuts vs Zero Sugar Chocolate Candy

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Roasted Salted Macadamia Nuts

Roasted Salted Macadamia Nuts

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Zero Sugar Chocolate Candy

Zero Sugar Chocolate Candy

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
700 kcal
Energy
406 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
0g
76.7g
Fat
28.1g
6.7g
Protein
3.1g
0g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Roasted Salted Macadamia Nuts and Zero Sugar Chocolate Candy side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Roasted Salted Macadamia Nuts is the more energy-dense option here, packing 294 more calories per 100g than Zero Sugar Chocolate Candy. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Roasted Salted Macadamia Nuts contains significantly more sugar (3.33g) compared to the milder Zero Sugar Chocolate Candy (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Zero Sugar Chocolate Candy is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Roasted Salted Macadamia Nuts offers a protein boost with 6.67g per 100g, outperforming Zero Sugar Chocolate Candy in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Roasted Salted Macadamia Nuts or Zero Sugar Chocolate Candy?

It depends on your goals. Roasted Salted Macadamia Nuts has 700 calories, while Zero Sugar Chocolate Candy has 406 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Roasted Salted Macadamia Nuts vegan?

No, Roasted Salted Macadamia Nuts is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Roasted Salted Macadamia Nuts and Zero Sugar Chocolate Candy?

There is a difference of 294 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.