Head-to-Head Analysis

Roasted Seaweed sandwich vs Green Olives Stuffed with Garlic

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Roasted Seaweed sandwich

Roasted Seaweed sandwich

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Green Olives Stuffed with Garlic

Green Olives Stuffed with Garlic

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
417 kcal
Energy
167 kcal
16.7g
Sugars
0g
16.7g
Fat
16.7g
33.3g
Protein
0g
4.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Roasted Seaweed sandwich and Green Olives Stuffed with Garlic side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Roasted Seaweed sandwich is the more energy-dense option here, packing 250 more calories per 100g than Green Olives Stuffed with Garlic. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Roasted Seaweed sandwich contains significantly more sugar (16.7g) compared to the milder Green Olives Stuffed with Garlic (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Green Olives Stuffed with Garlic is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Roasted Seaweed sandwich offers a protein boost with 33.3g per 100g, outperforming Green Olives Stuffed with Garlic in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Roasted Seaweed sandwich or Green Olives Stuffed with Garlic?

It depends on your goals. Roasted Seaweed sandwich has 417 calories, while Green Olives Stuffed with Garlic has 167 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Roasted Seaweed sandwich vegan?

No, Roasted Seaweed sandwich is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Roasted Seaweed sandwich and Green Olives Stuffed with Garlic?

There is a difference of 250 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.