Head-to-Head Analysis

ROASTED TURKEY BREAST with herb dressing & cinnamon apples vs Chicken bakes

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of ROASTED TURKEY BREAST with herb dressing & cinnamon apples

ROASTED TURKEY BREAST with herb dressing & cinnamon apples

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chicken bakes

Chicken bakes

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
105 kcal
Energy
238 kcal
9.8g
Sugars
3.1g
1.8g
Fat
8.4g
4.7g
Protein
15.4g
0.7g
Salt
1.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing ROASTED TURKEY BREAST with herb dressing & cinnamon apples and Chicken bakes side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, ROASTED TURKEY BREAST with herb dressing & cinnamon apples is the clear winner. With 133 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. ROASTED TURKEY BREAST with herb dressing & cinnamon apples contains significantly more sugar (9.78g) compared to the milder Chicken bakes (3.08g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chicken bakes is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: ROASTED TURKEY BREAST with herb dressing & cinnamon apples or Chicken bakes?

It depends on your goals. ROASTED TURKEY BREAST with herb dressing & cinnamon apples has 105 calories, while Chicken bakes has 238 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is ROASTED TURKEY BREAST with herb dressing & cinnamon apples vegan?

No, ROASTED TURKEY BREAST with herb dressing & cinnamon apples is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between ROASTED TURKEY BREAST with herb dressing & cinnamon apples and Chicken bakes?

There is a difference of 133 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.