Head-to-Head Analysis

Roasted Unsalted Almonds vs colonial times strawberry blueberry granola

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Roasted Unsalted Almonds

Roasted Unsalted Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Package of colonial times strawberry blueberry granola

colonial times strawberry blueberry granola

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
600 kcal
Energy
240 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
8g
43.3g
Fat
8g
20g
Protein
8g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Roasted Unsalted Almonds and colonial times strawberry blueberry granola side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Roasted Unsalted Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 360 more calories per 100g than colonial times strawberry blueberry granola. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Roasted Unsalted Almonds takes the lead with only 3.33g of sugar per 100g, whereas colonial times strawberry blueberry granola contains 8g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Roasted Unsalted Almonds offers a protein boost with 20g per 100g, outperforming colonial times strawberry blueberry granola in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Roasted Unsalted Almonds or colonial times strawberry blueberry granola?

It depends on your goals. Roasted Unsalted Almonds has 600 calories, while colonial times strawberry blueberry granola has 240 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Roasted Unsalted Almonds vegan?

No, Roasted Unsalted Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Roasted Unsalted Almonds and colonial times strawberry blueberry granola?

There is a difference of 360 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.