Robiolina vs Reduced Fat 2% Milk
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Robiolina
Reduced Fat 2% Milk
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Robiolina and Reduced Fat 2% Milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Robiolina is the more energy-dense option here, packing 267 more calories per 100g than Reduced Fat 2% Milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Robiolina takes the lead with only 0.705g of sugar per 100g, whereas Reduced Fat 2% Milk contains 5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Robiolina offers a protein boost with 12.7g per 100g, outperforming Reduced Fat 2% Milk in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Robiolina or Reduced Fat 2% Milk?
It depends on your goals. Robiolina has 317 calories, while Reduced Fat 2% Milk has 50 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Robiolina vegan?
No, Robiolina is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Robiolina and Reduced Fat 2% Milk?
There is a difference of 267 calories per 100g between the two products.
