Head-to-Head Analysis

Rock Toat - Chicken Meat Floss Flavor vs Tostones chips garlic

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Rock Toat - Chicken Meat Floss Flavor

Rock Toat - Chicken Meat Floss Flavor

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Tostones chips garlic

Tostones chips garlic

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
412 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
11.7g
Sugars
3.6g
23.3g
Fat
25g
8.3g
Protein
3.6g
0.8g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Rock Toat - Chicken Meat Floss Flavor and Tostones chips garlic side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Rock Toat - Chicken Meat Floss Flavor is the clear winner. With 88 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Rock Toat - Chicken Meat Floss Flavor contains significantly more sugar (11.7g) compared to the milder Tostones chips garlic (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Tostones chips garlic is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Rock Toat - Chicken Meat Floss Flavor offers a protein boost with 8.33g per 100g, outperforming Tostones chips garlic in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Rock Toat - Chicken Meat Floss Flavor or Tostones chips garlic?

It depends on your goals. Rock Toat - Chicken Meat Floss Flavor has 412 calories, while Tostones chips garlic has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Rock Toat - Chicken Meat Floss Flavor vegan?

No, Rock Toat - Chicken Meat Floss Flavor is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Rock Toat - Chicken Meat Floss Flavor and Tostones chips garlic?

There is a difference of 88 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.