Head-to-Head Analysis

Roll vs Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Roll

Roll

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip

Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
263.2 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
5.3g
Sugars
42.9g
3.9g
Fat
21.4g
9.2g
Protein
3.6g
1.2g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Roll and Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Roll is the clear winner. With 237 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Roll takes the lead with only 5.26315789473684g of sugar per 100g, whereas Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip contains 42.9g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Roll offers a protein boost with 9.21052631578947g per 100g, outperforming Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Roll or Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip?

Roll appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Roll vegan?

No, Roll is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Roll and Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip?

There is a difference of 237 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.