Head-to-Head Analysis

Rosemary & Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers vs Classic cake mix imp

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Rosemary & Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers

Rosemary & Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Classic cake mix imp

Classic cake mix imp

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
395.4 kcal
0g
Sugars
41.9g
30g
Fat
9.3g
10g
Protein
4.7g
1.9g
Salt
2.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Rosemary & Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers and Classic cake mix imp side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Rosemary & Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers is the more energy-dense option here, packing 105 more calories per 100g than Classic cake mix imp. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Rosemary & Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Classic cake mix imp contains 41.86g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Rosemary & Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Classic cake mix imp in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Rosemary & Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers or Classic cake mix imp?

It depends on your goals. Rosemary & Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers has 500 calories, while Classic cake mix imp has 395.35 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Rosemary & Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers vegan?

No, Rosemary & Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Rosemary & Sea Salt Almond Flour Crackers and Classic cake mix imp?

There is a difference of 105 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.