Head-to-Head Analysis

Rotisserie chicken breast vs Orville Redenbachers Kettle Corn

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Rotisserie chicken breast

Rotisserie chicken breast

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Orville Redenbachers Kettle Corn

Orville Redenbachers Kettle Corn

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
142.9 kcal
Energy
470.6 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
3.6g
Fat
23.5g
21.4g
Protein
8.8g
1.9g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Rotisserie chicken breast and Orville Redenbachers Kettle Corn side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Rotisserie chicken breast is the clear winner. With 328 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Rotisserie chicken breast contains significantly more sugar (3.5714285714286g) compared to the milder Orville Redenbachers Kettle Corn (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Orville Redenbachers Kettle Corn is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Rotisserie chicken breast offers a protein boost with 21.428571428571g per 100g, outperforming Orville Redenbachers Kettle Corn in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Rotisserie chicken breast or Orville Redenbachers Kettle Corn?

It depends on your goals. Rotisserie chicken breast has 142.85714285714 calories, while Orville Redenbachers Kettle Corn has 470.58823529412 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Rotisserie chicken breast vegan?

No, Rotisserie chicken breast is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Rotisserie chicken breast and Orville Redenbachers Kettle Corn?

There is a difference of 328 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.