Head-to-Head Analysis

Royale, boneless cooked ham vs Flake Light Tuna in Water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Royale, boneless cooked ham

Royale, boneless cooked ham

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Flake Light Tuna in Water

Flake Light Tuna in Water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
115 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
8.9g
Fat
3.1g
16.1g
Protein
20.4g
2.3g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Royale, boneless cooked ham and Flake Light Tuna in Water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Royale, boneless cooked ham is the more energy-dense option here, packing 28 more calories per 100g than Flake Light Tuna in Water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Royale, boneless cooked ham or Flake Light Tuna in Water?

It depends on your goals. Royale, boneless cooked ham has 143 calories, while Flake Light Tuna in Water has 115 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Royale, boneless cooked ham vegan?

No, Royale, boneless cooked ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Royale, boneless cooked ham and Flake Light Tuna in Water?

There is a difference of 28 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.