Head-to-Head Analysis

RUB caribbean jerk seasoning vs Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of RUB caribbean jerk seasoning

RUB caribbean jerk seasoning

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added

Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
199 kcal
Energy
40.3 kcal
19g
Sugars
4.8g
3.8g
Fat
0g
4.8g
Protein
1g
40g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing RUB caribbean jerk seasoning and Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

RUB caribbean jerk seasoning is the more energy-dense option here, packing 159 more calories per 100g than Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. RUB caribbean jerk seasoning contains significantly more sugar (19g) compared to the milder Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added (4.84g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? RUB caribbean jerk seasoning offers a protein boost with 4.8g per 100g, outperforming Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: RUB caribbean jerk seasoning or Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added?

It depends on your goals. RUB caribbean jerk seasoning has 199 calories, while Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added has 40.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is RUB caribbean jerk seasoning vegan?

No, RUB caribbean jerk seasoning is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between RUB caribbean jerk seasoning and Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added?

There is a difference of 159 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.