Ruby Couverture Almonds vs Salted roasted cashews
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Ruby Couverture Almonds
Salted roasted cashews
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Ruby Couverture Almonds and Salted roasted cashews side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Ruby Couverture Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 10 more calories per 100g than Salted roasted cashews. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Ruby Couverture Almonds contains significantly more sugar (32.3g) compared to the milder Salted roasted cashews (5.36g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Salted roasted cashews is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Ruby Couverture Almonds or Salted roasted cashews?
It depends on your goals. Ruby Couverture Almonds has 581 calories, while Salted roasted cashews has 571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Ruby Couverture Almonds vegan?
No, Ruby Couverture Almonds is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Ruby Couverture Almonds and Salted roasted cashews?
There is a difference of 10 calories per 100g between the two products.
