Head-to-Head Analysis

Ruby Couverture Almonds vs The Complete Cookie Double Chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Ruby Couverture Almonds

Ruby Couverture Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of The Complete Cookie Double Chocolate

The Complete Cookie Double Chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
581 kcal
Energy
350.9 kcal
32.3g
Sugars
21.1g
45.2g
Fat
12.3g
12.9g
Protein
14g
0.1g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ruby Couverture Almonds and The Complete Cookie Double Chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Ruby Couverture Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 230 more calories per 100g than The Complete Cookie Double Chocolate. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Ruby Couverture Almonds contains significantly more sugar (32.3g) compared to the milder The Complete Cookie Double Chocolate (21.05g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, The Complete Cookie Double Chocolate is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ruby Couverture Almonds or The Complete Cookie Double Chocolate?

It depends on your goals. Ruby Couverture Almonds has 581 calories, while The Complete Cookie Double Chocolate has 350.88 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ruby Couverture Almonds vegan?

No, Ruby Couverture Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ruby Couverture Almonds and The Complete Cookie Double Chocolate?

There is a difference of 230 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.