Head-to-Head Analysis

Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips vs Flax, gluten-free, toadted coconut brownie, mini

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips

Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Flax, gluten-free, toadted coconut brownie, mini

Flax, gluten-free, toadted coconut brownie, mini

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
535.7 kcal
Energy
424.2 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
30.3g
32.1g
Fat
24.2g
7.1g
Protein
6.1g
1.5g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips and Flax, gluten-free, toadted coconut brownie, mini side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 111 more calories per 100g than Flax, gluten-free, toadted coconut brownie, mini. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips takes the lead with only 3.5714285714286g of sugar per 100g, whereas Flax, gluten-free, toadted coconut brownie, mini contains 30.30303030303g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips or Flax, gluten-free, toadted coconut brownie, mini?

It depends on your goals. Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips has 535.71428571429 calories, while Flax, gluten-free, toadted coconut brownie, mini has 424.24242424242 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips vegan?

No, Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips and Flax, gluten-free, toadted coconut brownie, mini?

There is a difference of 111 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.