Head-to-Head Analysis

Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips vs Sausalito Milk Chocolate Macadamia

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips

Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sausalito Milk Chocolate Macadamia

Sausalito Milk Chocolate Macadamia

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
535.7 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
38.5g
32.1g
Fat
26.9g
7.1g
Protein
3.9g
1.5g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips and Sausalito Milk Chocolate Macadamia side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 36 more calories per 100g than Sausalito Milk Chocolate Macadamia. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips takes the lead with only 3.5714285714286g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sausalito Milk Chocolate Macadamia contains 38.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips offers a protein boost with 7.1428571428571g per 100g, outperforming Sausalito Milk Chocolate Macadamia in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips or Sausalito Milk Chocolate Macadamia?

It depends on your goals. Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips has 535.71428571429 calories, while Sausalito Milk Chocolate Macadamia has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips vegan?

No, Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ruffles Jalapeno Ranch Chips and Sausalito Milk Chocolate Macadamia?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.