Head-to-Head Analysis

Runamok - Bourbon Barrel-Aged Maple Syrup, 250ml vs Raw Unfiltered Honey

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Runamok - Bourbon Barrel-Aged Maple Syrup, 250ml

Runamok - Bourbon Barrel-Aged Maple Syrup, 250ml

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Raw Unfiltered Honey

Raw Unfiltered Honey

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
350 kcal
Energy
285.7 kcal
88.3g
Sugars
81g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Runamok - Bourbon Barrel-Aged Maple Syrup, 250ml and Raw Unfiltered Honey side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Runamok - Bourbon Barrel-Aged Maple Syrup, 250ml is the more energy-dense option here, packing 64 more calories per 100g than Raw Unfiltered Honey. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Runamok - Bourbon Barrel-Aged Maple Syrup, 250ml contains significantly more sugar (88.33g) compared to the milder Raw Unfiltered Honey (80.952380952381g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Raw Unfiltered Honey is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Runamok - Bourbon Barrel-Aged Maple Syrup, 250ml or Raw Unfiltered Honey?

It depends on your goals. Runamok - Bourbon Barrel-Aged Maple Syrup, 250ml has 350 calories, while Raw Unfiltered Honey has 285.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Runamok - Bourbon Barrel-Aged Maple Syrup, 250ml vegan?

No, Runamok - Bourbon Barrel-Aged Maple Syrup, 250ml is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Runamok - Bourbon Barrel-Aged Maple Syrup, 250ml and Raw Unfiltered Honey?

There is a difference of 64 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.