Head-to-Head Analysis

Russet potato vs Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Russet potato

Russet potato

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips

Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
25g
0g
Protein
14.3g
0g
Salt
2.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Russet potato and Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Russet potato is the clear winner. With 536 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Russet potato or Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips?

It depends on your goals. Russet potato has 0 calories, while Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Russet potato vegan?

No, Russet potato is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Russet potato and Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips?

There is a difference of 536 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.